Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2019, #05; Tue, 29)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/04, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > There was also some discussion around the naming of the option, but I
> > don't have a strong opinion on that, so I'm happy with keeping the
> > --[no-]overlay option.  I just wanted to bring it up again here in
> > case someone had a very strong opinion, and would prefer it being
> > changed before this goes into 2.21.  (Not sure if I'm too late for the
> > series going to master).
> 
> I do not mind leaving this topic out of 'master' for now, if that
> would help migrate people only once instead of twice.  I think the
> real UI improvement would come with the new pair of commands split
> out of here, "switch-branches" and "restore-files", which will not
> happen within the timeframe of the current cycle anyway.

Agreed, I don't mind having this topic wait a little longer until
"restore-files" actually becomes a thing.  Just keeping it in 'next'
for now sounds good to me.

> In any case, I think it is probably sensible to revert this step.
> Will queue; thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux