Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] t6120: test for describe with a bare repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This ensures that nothing breaks the basic functionality of describe for
> bare repositories. Please note that --broken and --dirty need a working
> tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t6120-describe.sh | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> index 7cfed77c52..ea2c3dbe1c 100755
> --- a/t/t6120-describe.sh
> +++ b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> @@ -418,4 +418,9 @@ test_expect_success 'describe complains about missing object' '
>  	test_must_fail git describe $ZERO_OID
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'describe works from outside repo using --git-dir' ' 
> +  git clone --bare "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/bare" &&
> +  git --git-dir "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/bare" describe
> +'

OK, it demonstrates that the command exits with status 0.  Do we
want to validate its output, too?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux