Hi Michal,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Michal Nowak wrote:
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 8:38 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >> >> Are we misusing C formats?
> >> >
> >> > The C standard and POSIX both say that the * refers to the maximum
> >> > number of bytes to print but it looks like it is being treated as the
> >> > maximum number of characters on OpenIndiana.
> >> >
> >> > Johannes - Perhaps we should change it to use fwrite() unless
> >> printf()
> >> > gets fixed and we're sure no other operating systems are affected?
> >>
> >> Avoid such a rewrite, as "%*.s" that takes (int, char *) are used in
> >> many other places in our codebase, if you can.
> >
> > Yes, this would be painful in particular in cases like
> >
> > master:advice.c:101: fprintf(stderr, _("%shint: %.*s%s\n"),
> >
> > where we want to write more than just a variable-length buffer.
> >
> > I am curious: is libintl (gettext) used on OpenIndiana? I ask because
> > AFAIR fprintf() is overridden in that case, and the bug might be a lot
> > easier to fix if it is in libintl rather than in libc.
>
> here you can see the full output of the OpenIndiana git build: https://hipster.openindiana.org/logs/oi-userland/latest/git.publish.log.
>
> From what I see there, libintl was found.
>
> If you believe this is illumos libc bug, it would be cool if someone created an simple testcase, which I can forward to the illumos developers.
You already have that example. Just take the UTF-8 text in your original
bug report, put it into something like
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char utf8[] = "... your text here...";
printf("%.*s", (int)(sizeof(utf8) - 1), utf8);
return 0;
}
You should first verify, though, that this replicate the problem, and if
it does not, use libintl (I think you have to `#include <gettext.h>` and
`-lintl` or some such) and see whether that reproduces your problem.
Ciao,
Johannes
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> >
> > Of course, it might *still* be a bug in libc by virtue of handing '%.*s'
> > through to libc's implementation.
> >
> > Alban, can you test this with NO_GETTEXT?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johannes
>
