Hi, On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:41:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >... > > > Adrian has a point in that if there are lines to be deleted, that in > > > itself is context, and then the strict behaviour of "git-apply" is > > > arguably unnecessaily strict. > > > > Not really. That is true, unless you have two identical instances of > > the group of lines being deleted, in which case you cannot safely tell > > which instance is to be removed. > >... > > The interesting thing is that you can never safely tell it for any > amount of context - I've seen patches with three lines of context being > applied at the wrong place simply because there were several matching > contexts. Yes, that is right. You can never safely tell. But now you want to allow even less context by default. In which you can even "more neverer" safely tell. That is why I am disagreeing with that change. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
