Re: There should be a `.gitbless; file, protecting files from git clean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:24 PM Sebastian Gniazdowski
<psprint@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28 stycznia 2019 at 06:05:31, Duy Nguyen (pclouds@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:54 AM Sebastian Gniazdowski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Could a .gitbless file be a solution? I would list in it, e.g.:
> > >
> > > TODO
> > >
> > > and this way be able to use `git -dxf' again. What do you think?
> >
> > There's a patch that adds "precious" git attribute [1]. I was going to
> > resend once the backup-log [2] got reviewed but I might just send it
> > separately to handle the "git clean" case alone.
>
> That would be nice solution. In the email, you ask for a name other than "precious". So maybe "blessed"?

There's a couple mail replies in that thread that pointed out
"precious" has been used elsewhere (I think Makefile is one) so I
think I'm going to stick with "precious". Besides it sounds "precious"
:D
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux