"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm glad we're using Python 3 here, but I wonder if the name "python" > will lead people to think it will work with Python 2 as well. There are > people using up-to-date Git on systems like CentOS 6 and 7, where Python > 3 is not generally available. > > Could we call this "python3" instead, or provide some other way to > communicate this to the user? Sounds like a good idea. Also would this be _the_ sole http server implementation Python3 users would choose, or is it just a possible one? What I am trying to get at is that we might need to be even more specific than just "python 3", but may need to convey that this is for "http.server using python 3". I dunno.
