On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 4:35 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:58:01AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > Now, on to the actual bug. The simplest reproduction is:
> >
> > (echo "[attr]foo bar"; echo "* foo") >.gitattributes
> > git check-attr foo file
>
> Actually, even simpler is to just "binary", which is pre-defined as a
> macro. :)
>
> > which should report "foo" as set. This bisects to 60a12722ac (attr:
> > remove maybe-real, maybe-macro from git_attr, 2017-01-27), and it seems
> > like an unintentional regression there. I haven't yet poked into that
> > commit to see what the fix will look like.
>
> So here's the fix I came up with. +cc Duy, as this is really tangled
> with his older 06a604e670.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] attr: do not mark queried macros as unset
>
> Since 60a12722ac (attr: remove maybe-real, maybe-macro from git_attr,
> 2017-01-27), we will always mark an attribute macro (e.g., "binary")
> that is specifically queried for as "unspecified", even though listing
> _all_ attributes would display it at set. E.g.:
>
> $ echo "* binary" >.gitattributes
>
> $ git check-attr -a file
> file: binary: set
> file: diff: unset
> file: merge: unset
> file: text: unset
>
> $ git check-attr binary file
> file: binary: unspecified
>
> The problem stems from an incorrect conversion of the optimization from
> 06a604e670 (attr: avoid heavy work when we know the specified attr is
> not defined, 2014-12-28). There we tried in collect_some_attrs() to
> avoid even looking at the attr_stack when the user has asked for "foo"
> and we know that "foo" did not ever appear in any .gitattributes file.
>
> It used a flag "maybe_real" in each attribute struct, where "real" meant
> that the attribute appeared in an actual file (we have to make this
> distinction because we also create an attribute struct for any names
> that are being queried). But as explained in that commit message, the
> meaning of "real" was tangled with some special cases around macros.
>
> When 06a604e670 later refactored the macro code, it dropped maybe_real
60a12722ac or 06a604e670? I'm guessing the former.
> entirely. This missed the fact that "maybe_real" could be unset for two
> reasons: because of a macro, or because it was never found during
> parsing. This had two results:
>
> - the optimization in collect_some_attrs() ceased doing anything
> meaningful, since it no longer kept track of "was it found during
> parsing"
>
> - worse, it actually kicked in when the caller _did_ ask about a macro
> by name, causing us to mark it as unspecified
>
> It should be possible to salvage this optimization, but let's start with
> just removing the remnants. It hasn't been doing anything (except
> creating bugs) since 60a12722ac, and nobody seems to have noticed the
> performance regression. It's more important to fix the correctness
> problem clearly first.
>
> I've added two tests here. The second one actually shows off the bug.
> The test of "check-attr -a" is not strictly necessary, but we currently
> do not test attribute macros much, and the builtin "binary" not at all.
> So this increases our general test coverage, as well as making sure we
> didn't mess up this related case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: me.
> ---
> attr.c | 16 +---------------
> t/t0003-attributes.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c
> index eaece6658d..57ced792f8 100644
> --- a/attr.c
> +++ b/attr.c
> @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static void collect_some_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
> const char *path,
> struct attr_check *check)
> {
> - int i, pathlen, rem, dirlen;
> + int pathlen, rem, dirlen;
> const char *cp, *last_slash = NULL;
> int basename_offset;
>
> @@ -1113,20 +1113,6 @@ static void collect_some_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
> all_attrs_init(&g_attr_hashmap, check);
> determine_macros(check->all_attrs, check->stack);
>
> - if (check->nr) {
> - rem = 0;
> - for (i = 0; i < check->nr; i++) {
> - int n = check->items[i].attr->attr_nr;
> - struct all_attrs_item *item = &check->all_attrs[n];
> - if (item->macro) {
> - item->value = ATTR__UNSET;
> - rem++;
> - }
> - }
> - if (rem == check->nr)
> - return;
> - }
> -
> rem = check->all_attrs_nr;
> fill(path, pathlen, basename_offset, check->stack, check->all_attrs, rem);
> }
> diff --git a/t/t0003-attributes.sh b/t/t0003-attributes.sh
> index 22499bce5f..71e63d8b50 100755
> --- a/t/t0003-attributes.sh
> +++ b/t/t0003-attributes.sh
> @@ -322,4 +322,24 @@ test_expect_success 'bare repository: test info/attributes' '
> )
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'binary macro expanded by -a' '
> + echo "file binary" >.gitattributes &&
> + cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
> + file: binary: set
> + file: diff: unset
> + file: merge: unset
> + file: text: unset
> + EOF
> + git check-attr -a file >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> +
> +test_expect_success 'query binary macro directly' '
> + echo "file binary" >.gitattributes &&
> + echo file: binary: set >expect &&
> + git check-attr binary file >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> test_done
> --
> 2.20.1.691.ge06e0a624f
>
--
Duy
