Junio C Hamano wrote:
> しらいしななこ <nanako3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I am sorry to join the discussion late, but I think it is much better to let
> > the user give a short reminder message from the command line. For example,
> >
> > $ git stash add customized message to stash
> >
> > When I say "git stash list", I want to see which branch I was on when I was
> > in the middle of doing something, and what that something was. It is not
> > interesting which commit on that branch I started that change from. After
> > creating a stash without a message, and then another stash with a message, I
> > want to see:
> >
> > $ git stash list
> > stash@{0}: On master: add customized message to stash
> > stash@{1}: WIP on master: 36e5e70... Start deprecating "git-command" in favor of "git command"
>
> Hmph. I only recently got interested in "stash", so have not
> enough real-life experience to base my judgement on, but I think
> I'd agree with your reasoning.
>
> Perhaps something like this?
I didn't test it yet, but it sounds good. I will apply your patch and
work a while with it. But I think if someone adds documentation, I will
give my Ack. :-)
BTW: I prefer help over usage, but if it nanako prefers usage, why not
both?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Uwe Kleine-König
http://www.google.com/search?q=1+stone%3D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
