Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > I am about to submit a new iteration of my patch series, would it be too
>> > much trouble for you to rebase on top? If it would be, let me know, then I
>> > will rebase on top of yours.
>> 
>> Or both of you keep the topics as-is and self-consistent, and let
>> the rerere machinery to squash it in when the two topics gets
>> merged.
>
> With all the experience I have with rerere, I don't trust it.

FWIW, I trust it once I got right resolution better than randomly
rebased resubmission that needs to be re-reviewed afresh.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux