Quoting Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I noticed another thing. The entries shown in "git stash list"
>> look like this:
>>
>> stash@{0}: js/stash: e1d32c1... Teach git-stash to "apply --index"
>> stash@{1}: master: 5be6007... Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
>> stash@{2}: master: 36e5e70... Start deprecating "git-command" in favor of "git command"
>> stash@{3}: master: 3b0d999... Merge branch 'jo/init'
>>
>> But each of the stash is _not_ about these commits, but is about
>> some change that happens to be on top of them.
>>
>> So risking to make it a tad longer, how about doing this on top?
>>
>> - git update-ref -m "$msg" $ref_stash $w_commit ||
>> + git update-ref -m "WIP on $msg" $ref_stash $w_commit ||
>
> I like that. I already wondered about that, too. But not as much as
> thinking about an alternative.
>
> So:
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am sorry to join the discussion late, but I think it is much better to let
the user give a short reminder message from the command line. For example,
$ git stash add customized message to stash
When I say "git stash list", I want to see which branch I was on when I was
in the middle of doing something, and what that something was. It is not
interesting which commit on that branch I started that change from. After
creating a stash without a message, and then another stash with a message, I
want to see:
$ git stash list
stash@{0}: On master: add customized message to stash
stash@{1}: WIP on master: 36e5e70... Start deprecating "git-command" in favor of "git command"
--
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free pop3 email with a spam filter.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/5
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
