On 12/20, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote: > This commits introduces a optimization by avoiding calling the > same functions again. For example, `git stash push -u` > would call at some points the following functions: > > * `check_changes()` (inside `do_push_stash()`) > * `do_create_stash()`, which calls: `check_changes()` and > `get_untracked_files()` > > Note that `check_changes()` also calls `get_untracked_files()`. > So, `check_changes()` is called 2 times and `get_untracked_files()` > 3 times. > > The old function `check_changes()` now consists of two functions: > `get_untracked_files()` and `check_changes_tracked_files()`. > > These are the call chains for `push` and `create`: > > * `push_stash()` -> `do_push_stash()` -> `do_create_stash()` > > * `create_stash()` -> `do_create_stash()` > > To prevent calling the same functions over and over again, > `check_changes()` inside `do_create_stash()` is now placed > in the caller functions (`create_stash()` and `do_push_stash()`). > This way `check_changes()` and `get_untracked files()` are called > only one time. > > https://public-inbox.org/git/20180818223329.GJ11326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I missed this the other time, but having this link in the commit message is unnecessary, and it may go stale (though in this case it includes the Message-ID, so it is still useful as long as some archive exists. The commit message explains well enough what this change is doing, even without the link to the review. Sorry I missed these things in the earlier rounds somehow. > Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > builtin/stash--helper.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/stash--helper.c b/builtin/stash--helper.c > index 19ead63c46..4b63352927 100644 > --- a/builtin/stash--helper.c > +++ b/builtin/stash--helper.c > @@ -884,18 +884,18 @@ static int get_untracked_files(struct pathspec ps, int include_untracked, > } > > /* > - * The return value of `check_changes()` can be: > + * The return value of `check_changes_tracked_files()` can be: > * > * < 0 if there was an error > * = 0 if there are no changes. > * > 0 if there are changes. > */ > -static int check_changes(struct pathspec ps, int include_untracked) > + Unnecessary blank line after the comment here. > +static int check_changes_tracked_files(struct pathspec ps) > { > int result; > struct rev_info rev; > struct object_id dummy; > - struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT; > > /* No initial commit. */ > if (get_oid("HEAD", &dummy)) > @@ -923,14 +923,26 @@ static int check_changes(struct pathspec ps, int include_untracked) > if (diff_result_code(&rev.diffopt, result)) > return 1; > > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * The function will fill `untracked_files` with the names of untracked files > + * It will return 1 if there were any changes and 0 if there were not. > + */ > + Unnecessary blank line. > +static int check_changes(struct pathspec ps, int include_untracked, > + struct strbuf *untracked_files) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + if (check_changes_tracked_files(ps)) > + ret = 1; > + > if (include_untracked && get_untracked_files(ps, include_untracked, > - &out)) { > - strbuf_release(&out); > - return 1; > - } > + untracked_files)) > + ret = 1; > > - strbuf_release(&out); > - return 0; > + return ret; > } > > static int save_untracked_files(struct stash_info *info, struct strbuf *msg, > @@ -1141,7 +1153,7 @@ static int do_create_stash(struct pathspec ps, struct strbuf *stash_msg_buf, > head_commit = lookup_commit(the_repository, &info->b_commit); > } > > - if (!check_changes(ps, include_untracked)) { > + if (!check_changes(ps, include_untracked, &untracked_files)) { > ret = 1; > goto done; > } > @@ -1166,8 +1178,7 @@ static int do_create_stash(struct pathspec ps, struct strbuf *stash_msg_buf, > goto done; > } > > - if (include_untracked && get_untracked_files(ps, include_untracked, > - &untracked_files)) { > + if (include_untracked) { > if (save_untracked_files(info, &msg, untracked_files)) { > if (!quiet) > fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Cannot save " > @@ -1252,20 +1263,15 @@ static int create_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > 0); > > memset(&ps, 0, sizeof(ps)); > - strbuf_addstr(&stash_msg_buf, stash_msg); > - ret = do_create_stash(ps, &stash_msg_buf, include_untracked, 0, &info, > - NULL, 0); > + if (!check_changes_tracked_files(ps)) > + return 0; > > - if (!ret) > + strbuf_addstr(&stash_msg_buf, stash_msg); > + if (!(ret = do_create_stash(ps, &stash_msg_buf, 0, 0, &info, NULL, 0))) It's a bit odd to have do_create_stash moved inside the if here, even though it was introduced in this patch series. It makes the patch a bit more noisy and harder to see what was changed here. > printf_ln("%s", oid_to_hex(&info.w_commit)); > > strbuf_release(&stash_msg_buf); > - > - /* > - * ret can be 1 if there were no changes. In this case, we should > - * not error out. > - */ > - return ret < 0; > + return ret; > } > > static int do_push_stash(struct pathspec ps, const char *stash_msg, int quiet, > @@ -1275,6 +1281,7 @@ static int do_push_stash(struct pathspec ps, const char *stash_msg, int quiet, > struct stash_info info; > struct strbuf patch = STRBUF_INIT; > struct strbuf stash_msg_buf = STRBUF_INIT; > + struct strbuf untracked_files = STRBUF_INIT; Does this strbuf also need to be released at the end of the function? > > if (patch_mode && keep_index == -1) > keep_index = 1; > @@ -1309,7 +1316,7 @@ static int do_push_stash(struct pathspec ps, const char *stash_msg, int quiet, > goto done; > } > > - if (!check_changes(ps, include_untracked)) { > + if (!check_changes(ps, include_untracked, &untracked_files)) { > if (!quiet) > printf_ln(_("No local changes to save")); > goto done; > -- > 2.20.1.441.g764a526393 >
