RE: [PATCH v4 2/4] config.mak.uname: support for modern HPE NonStop config.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On January 3, 2019 14:45, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> To: randall.s.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] config.mak.uname: support for modern HPE
> NonStop config.
> 
> randall.s.becker@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
> > @@ -470,8 +489,13 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),NONSTOP_KERNEL)
> >  	NO_MKDTEMP = YesPlease
> >  	# Currently libiconv-1.9.1.
> >  	OLD_ICONV = UnfortunatelyYes
> > -	NO_REGEX = YesPlease
> > +	NO_REGEX=NeedsStartEnd
> >  	NO_PTHREADS = UnfortunatelyYes
> >
> >  	# Not detected (nor checked for) by './configure'.
> >  	# We don't have SA_RESTART on NonStop, unfortunalety.
> 
> The hunk header claims that the preimage has 8 lines while the postimage
> has 13 lines, adding 5 new lines in total.  But that is not what we can
see in
> the hunk.
> 
> It is unclear to me if the numbers on the hunk header are bogus, or the
patch
> text was truncated, so I cannot use these two patches with confidence.
The
> first hunk had the same issue, and 1/4 too.
> 
> I do not see v4 3/4 and v4 4/4, either.  It's not like you are the only
person
> who sends patches to the mailing list, and not having the patches as
> responses to a cover letter for proper threading makes it very hard to see
> which patches belong to the same series and if all the necessary patches
in a
> series have become available.
> Is it possible to arrange that to happen?
> 
> Thanks.

I will reissue the whole package for you. I think I hacked it badly. Will
get to it after $DAYJOB is done.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux