Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve documentation on UTF-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 27 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:

> We've recently fielded several reports from unhappy Windows users about
> our handling of UTF-16, UTF-16LE, and UTF-16BE, none of which seem to be
> suitable for certain Windows programs.

Just for context, is "we" here $DAYJOB or a reference to some previous
ML thread(s) on this list, or something else?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux