Re: [PATCH] diff: add support for reading files literally with --no-index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 20 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:

> We don't include a test for the pipe scenario because I couldn't get
> that case to work in portable shell (although of course it works in
> bash). I have, however, tested it on both macOS and Linux. No clue how
> this works on Windows.

You can (and should) add tests using the PROCESS_SUBSTITUTION prereq
Dennis used in an earlier version of this:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20170113102021.6054-3-dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Even if that wasn't possible a bash-specific test is better than no
test, and can be had by including t/lib-bash.sh in your test, see
e.g. the completion tests.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux