Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah, I agree that such a "pass this through" struct full of options and > context would make sense. I just wouldn't tie it to the "serve" > machinery. > > Did you read the side-thread between me and Jonathan? Another option > here is to just have ls-refs assume that the client will tell it the > context (and assume uploadpack for now, since that's all that v2 > currently does). Yes, I'd be 100% happy with that, too. And it certainly is simpler. Thanks. P.S. I expect to be mostly offline for the coming 72 hours, as I and my wife are both down with a cold. I am guessing that we will enter slower weeks in many parts of the world, and hoping this won't be too disruptive.
