Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > What's so wrong with our man pages? You know, there have been man 
> > hours invested in them, and they are exclusively meant for consumption 
> > by people who do not know about the usage of the commands...
> 
> What's wrong is just that I shouldn't have to read a man page to avoid
> data-loss.

Okay, Mr Moy. How did you learn that "rm" leads to data-loss? Because it 
does. Hmm. How did you expect then, that git-rm does _not_ lead to data 
loss? If in doubt, you _have_ to read the manual. Especially if the tool 
is powerful.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux