Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> FWIW, I personally do not think "is sensitive to CRLF" is too bad, >> as my attempt to clarify it does not make it much better, e.g. >> >> The logic to read from these files in shell uses built-in >> "read" command, which leaves CR at the end of these text >> files when they are checked out with CRLF line endings, at >> least when run with bash shipped with Git for Windows. This >> results in an unexpected value in the variable these lines >> are read into, leading the tests to fail. >> >> So, I'll keep what I queued when I received v1 for now. > > Sorry for missing the edit to the message. You are correct that v2 > just added one commit. > > I like your rewording, if you feel like editing it. I'm kinda neutral ;-).
