Re: [PATCH 0/4]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>  - now these three changes that were problematic in the past is
>>    resent without any update (other than that it has one preparatory
>>    patch to add tests).
>
> One of the three changes was problematic, (e98317508c02),
> the other two are good (in company of the third).

Ah, that is what I failed to read.

> This means I need to revamp the commit messages and
> cover letter altogether.

I guess that would help future readers.  Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux