Re: [PATCH] git-mergetool: add support for ediff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso wrote:
> I'm just exploring alternatives.  Basically, it just seems interesting
> that ediff has a lot of nice features, but also has some incredibly
> user-hostile features.  The first time I tried using ediff, I indeed
> tried saving the buffer and exiting it.  That's when I discovered that
> after I changed the focus to the merge window and saved it, when I
> tried typing ^X^C, the exit failed with the error message "Attempt to
> delete a surrogate minibuffer frame".  That's the sort of thing that
> will cause non-elisp programmers to run screaming off into the
> distance.

Ouch.  Yes, I've never seen that before and no doubt if I had've I'd
feel the same way.  I just save the merge buffer and quit, and it is
pretty obedient for me.

However I guess it wouldn't be nice to have a merge mode that did not
work out of the box for a large number of users.

Your .el file certainly does the trick for me - I reckon throw it in
contrib/

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux