Hi, On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > With this option, dangling objects are not only reported, but also > > written to .git/lost-found/commit/ or .git/lost-found/other/. > > > > This obsoletes git-lost-found. > > [...] > > Please do not do that in a single patch. This patch is at least > talking about three timeframes. Right. My fault. > 1. git-fsck learns --lost-found > The patch adds that to the code and the documentation. > Then it is commented on, perhaps updated, and matures. > > 2. git-lost-found is marked as "deprecated" > This patch adds "deprecated" warning to the documentation. How about combining these two, and give a big WARNING: 'git lost-found' is deprecated. WARNING: Use 'git fsck --lost-found' instead whenever lost-found is called? > 3. git-lost-found is removed. Yes, that can wait. What is more important before doing 1&2 for real is this: lost-found ATM calls 'git-fsck --full --no-reflogs'. The patch does not force these two options when called with '--lost-found'. I would really appreciate opinions on this issue, and will gladly re-prepare a patch accordingly. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html