Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> The patch-id appears to only care about the diff text, so it should be >> able to handle this. So if we have a better heuristic for where the >> diff starts, it would be good to use it. > > No, the patch-id doesn't just care about the diff, it cares about the > context before the diff too. Sorry, I did a bad job of communicating. When I said "diff text", I was including context. [...] > Observe that the diff --git line matters, we hash it: > > $ git diff-tree -p HEAD~.. | git patch-id > 5870d115b7e2a9a936ab8fdc254932234413c710 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > $ git diff-tree --src-prefix=a/ --dst-prefix=b/ -p HEAD~.. | git patch-id --stable > 5870d115b7e2a9a936ab8fdc254932234413c710 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > $ git diff-tree --src-prefix=x/ --dst-prefix=y/ -p HEAD~.. | git patch-id --stable > 4cd136f2b98760150f700ac6a5b126389d6d05a7 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Oh, hm. That's unfortunate. [...] > So it seems most sensible to me if this is going to be supported that we > go a bit beyond the call of duty and fake up the start of it, namely: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > > To be: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c Right. We may want to handle diff.mnemonicPrefix as well. Jonathan