On 2018.12.05 23:48, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05 2018, Josh Steadmon wrote: > > > Breaks load_commit_graph_one() into a new function, > > parse_commit_graph(). The latter function operates on arbitrary buffers, > > which makes it suitable as a fuzzing target. > > > > Adds fuzz-commit-graph.c, which provides a fuzzing entry point > > compatible with libFuzzer (and possibly other fuzzing engines). > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .gitignore | 1 + > > Makefile | 1 + > > commit-graph.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > fuzz-commit-graph.c | 18 +++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 fuzz-commit-graph.c > > > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > > index 0d77ea5894..8bcf153ed9 100644 > > --- a/.gitignore > > +++ b/.gitignore > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > +/fuzz-commit-graph > > /fuzz_corpora > > /fuzz-pack-headers > > /fuzz-pack-idx > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index 1a44c811aa..6b72f37c29 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -684,6 +684,7 @@ SCRIPTS = $(SCRIPT_SH_INS) \ > > > > ETAGS_TARGET = TAGS > > > > +FUZZ_OBJS += fuzz-commit-graph.o > > FUZZ_OBJS += fuzz-pack-headers.o > > FUZZ_OBJS += fuzz-pack-idx.o > > > > diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c > > index 40c855f185..0755359b1a 100644 > > --- a/commit-graph.c > > +++ b/commit-graph.c > > @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ > > #define GRAPH_MIN_SIZE (GRAPH_HEADER_SIZE + 4 * GRAPH_CHUNKLOOKUP_WIDTH \ > > + GRAPH_FANOUT_SIZE + GRAPH_OID_LEN) > > > > +struct commit_graph *parse_commit_graph(void *graph_map, int fd, > > + size_t graph_size); > > + > > + > > char *get_commit_graph_filename(const char *obj_dir) > > { > > return xstrfmt("%s/info/commit-graph", obj_dir); > > @@ -84,16 +88,10 @@ static int commit_graph_compatible(struct repository *r) > > struct commit_graph *load_commit_graph_one(const char *graph_file) > > { > > void *graph_map; > > - const unsigned char *data, *chunk_lookup; > > size_t graph_size; > > struct stat st; > > - uint32_t i; > > - struct commit_graph *graph; > > + struct commit_graph *ret; > > int fd = git_open(graph_file); > > - uint64_t last_chunk_offset; > > - uint32_t last_chunk_id; > > - uint32_t graph_signature; > > - unsigned char graph_version, hash_version; > > > > if (fd < 0) > > return NULL; > > @@ -108,27 +106,61 @@ struct commit_graph *load_commit_graph_one(const char *graph_file) > > die(_("graph file %s is too small"), graph_file); > > } > > graph_map = xmmap(NULL, graph_size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); > > + ret = parse_commit_graph(graph_map, fd, graph_size); > > + > > + if (ret == NULL) { > > Code in git usually uses just !ret. Will fix in V2, thanks. > > + munmap(graph_map, graph_size); > > + close(fd); > > + exit(1); > > Ouch, exit(1) from load_commit_graph_one()? Can't we return NULL here > instead? Nasty to exit from a library routine, but then I see later... > > > @@ -201,11 +235,6 @@ struct commit_graph *load_commit_graph_one(const char *graph_file) > > } > > > > return graph; > > - > > -cleanup_fail: > > - munmap(graph_map, graph_size); > > - close(fd); > > - exit(1); > > } > > ... ah, I see this is where you got the exit(1) from. So it was there > already. > > > static void prepare_commit_graph_one(struct repository *r, const char *obj_dir) > > diff --git a/fuzz-commit-graph.c b/fuzz-commit-graph.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..420851d0d2 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/fuzz-commit-graph.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > > +#include "object-store.h" > > +#include "commit-graph.h" > > + > > +struct commit_graph *parse_commit_graph(void *graph_map, int fd, > > + size_t graph_size); > > + > > +int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size); > > + > > +int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) > > +{ > > + struct commit_graph *g; > > + > > + g = parse_commit_graph((void *) data, -1, size); > > + if (g) > > + free(g); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > I hadn't looked at this before, but see your 5e47215080 ("fuzz: add > basic fuzz testing target.", 2018-10-12) for some prior art. > > There's instructions there for a very long "make" invocation. Would be > nice if this were friendlier and we could just do "make test-fuzz" or > something... Yeah, the problem is that there are too many combinations of fuzzing engine, sanitizer, and compiler to make any reasonable default here. Even if you just stick with libFuzzer, address sanitizer, and clang, the flags change radically depending on which version of clang you're using.