On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:28 AM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Haven't really worked on killing the term "detached HEAD" yet. But I > noticed the other day that git-branch reports > > * (HEAD detached from 703266f6e4) > > and I didn't know how to rephrase that. I guess "unnamed branch from > 703266f6e4" is probably good enough but my old-timer brain screams no. "git worktree add" and "git worktree show" also report similar messages.
