Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > If "git clean" takes a pathspec, perhaps you can give a negative > pathspec to exclude whatever you do not want to get cleaned, > something like > > git clean '*.o' ':!precious.o' > > to say "presious.o is ignored (hence normally expendable), but I do > not want to clean it with this invocation of 'git clean'"? Hmph, this leads me to an interesting thought. With today's code, these two commands behave in meaningfully different ways when I mark some paths that match .gitignore patterns with the precious attribute. echo "*.ignored" >>.git/info/exclude echo "precious.* precious" >>.git/info/attributes : >expendable.ignored 2>precious.ignored git clean -n -x git clean -n -x ':(exclude,attr:precious)' I am not suggesting that giving "git clean" a configuration knob that always append pathspec elements, which would allow users to use the mechanism to set the above magic pathspec, would be a good approach. If we were to follow through this line of thought, an obvious thing to do is to always unconditonally append the above magic pathspec internally when running "git clean", which would mean * Existing projects and users' repositories will see no behaviour change, because they are unaware of the "precious" attribute. * People who learn the new feature can start using the "ignored but precious" class, without any need for transition period.
