Re: en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2018, #07; Fri, 30)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> * en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer (2018-11-08) 2 commits
>>  - rebase: implement --merge via git-rebase--interactive
>>  - git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery
>> 
>>  "git rebase --merge" as been reimplemented by reusing the internal
>>  machinery used for "git rebase -i".
>
> I *think* a new iteration has landed (which has 7 instead of 2 commits):
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20181122044841.20993-1-newren@xxxxxxxxx/

"Landed" as opposed to "be in-flight"?  

You got me worried by implying that I merged them to either 'master'
or 'next' where it is harder to back out ;-).

During the freeze, especially after -rc1, I stop paying attention to
anything other than regression fixes and fixes to the addition since
the previous releases, unless I have too much time and get bored and
the new topic is trivial (which often means a single patch).

I'll mark the topic with the following, and continue ignoring it (or
any other topics) for now.  Thanks.

* en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer (2018-11-08) 2 commits
 - rebase: implement --merge via git-rebase--interactive
 - git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery

 "git rebase --merge" as been reimplemented by reusing the internal
 machinery used for "git rebase -i".

 Reroll exists.
 cf. <20181122044841.20993-1-newren@xxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux