Stefan Xenos <sxenos@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Although I have no problem with "switch-branch" as a command name, > some alternative names we might consider for switch-branch might be: > > chbranch > swbranch Please never go in that direction. So far, we made a conscious effort to keep the names of most frequently used subcommand to proper words that can be understood by coders (IOW, I expect they know what 'grep' is, even though that may not be a 'proper word'). > switch > branch change (as a subcommand for the "branch" command) It is more like moving to the branch to work on. I think 'switch' is something SVN veterans may find familiar. Both are much better than ch/swbranch that are overly cryptic.
