On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:09 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:01 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > should we do > > something about detached HEAD in this switch-branch command (or > > whatever its name will be)? > > > > This is usually a confusing concept to new users > > And it just occurred to me that perhaps we should call this "unnamed > branch" (at least at high UI level) instead of detached HEAD. It is > technically not as accurate, but much better to understand. or 'direct' branch? I mean 'detached HEAD' itself is also not correct as the HEAD points to a valid commit/tag usually, so it is attached to that content. The detachment comes from the implicit "from a branch".
