Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > ... > In short, even a thorough study of the code (keeping in mind the few > tidbits of information provided by you) leaves me really wondering which > code you run, because it sure does not look like current `master` to me. > > And if it is not `master`, then I have to ask why you keep suggesting to > turn off the built-in rebase by default in `master`. > > Ciao, > Johannes > > P.S.: Maybe you have a hook you forgot to mention? Any response? Or can I retract jc/postpone-rebase-in-c that was prepared as a reaction to this?
