Re: [PATCH] Test that git add removes stages 1,2,3.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> git add seems to have a bug, where it doesn't remove stages 1,2,3
> if a stage 0 entry is already in the index.

But how does that happen? I do not know any way to use porcelain to 
achieve that bogus state.

AFAIK stages 1,2,3 are only populated when there are conflicts, in which 
case there is no stage 0. Literally the only way I see to have both is to 
_make_ update-index put them in there.

Pilot error?

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux