Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> if (rev->rdiff1) {
> + struct diff_options opts;
> + memcpy(&opts, &rev->diffopt, sizeof(opts));
> + opts.output_format &= ~(DIFF_FORMAT_DIFFSTAT | DIFF_FORMAT_SUMMARY);
> +
> fprintf_ln(rev->diffopt.file, "%s", rev->rdiff_title);
> show_range_diff(rev->rdiff1, rev->rdiff2,
> - rev->creation_factor, 1, &rev->diffopt);
> + rev->creation_factor, 1, &opts);
I am not quite convinced if this shallow copy is a safe thing to do.
Quite honestly at this late in the release cycle, as a band-aid, I'd
rather see a simpler revert than a change like this that we have to
worry about what happens if/when show_range_diff() _thinks_ it is
done with the opts and ends up discarding resources (e.g. "FILE *")
that are shared with rev->diffopt that would still have to be used
later.
