Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I do not know if it makes sense to have 3 and 5 separate; I suspect > a single patch that does "clarify the warning, and allow those who > have no choice in which version of Git to choose squelch it" would > suffice. I actually do not mind two patches for these, but I think the separation presented in the series is wrong (first to kill the canary completely, and then add it as if it were a completely separate advice). It would make more sense, at least to me, if - the earlier step is to clarify the warning on two points (i.e. this is safe to ignore, but you may want to know that you are using a stale Git when we see evidence that a newer one has already been used here) and then - the later step is to optionally make it possible to squelch it for those who do not have control over what version of Git they are allowed to run. But again, a single patch to do all of that is also fine.
