Re: [PATCH 5/5] index: offer advice for unknown index extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Now, a meta point.  Throughout this discussion, I have been hoping for
> some acknowledgement of the problem --- e.g. an "I am sympathetic to
> what you are trying to do, but <X>".  I wasn't able to find that, and
> that is part of what contributed to the feeling of not being heard.

I had little sympathy for what you were trying to do, i.e. killing
the coalmine canary that warns users about using older version of
Git when there clearly is a sign that a newer one is available to
them and they have already used it; there was no problem to be
acknowledged.

Not before "why is it different this time?" question gets answered
anyway.

And seeing the same "let's not enable the new extension" patch again
without much improved justification contributed greatly to the
feeling of not being heard.  The feeling is mutual.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux