On Mon, Nov 19 2018, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> Here is a test coverage report for the uncovered lines introduced in
> v2.20.0-rc0 compared to v2.19.1.
Thanks a lot for this.
> [...]
> builtin/rebase.c
> 62c23938fa 55) return env;
> [...]
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 62c23938f: tests: add a special setup
> where rebase.useBuiltin is off
This one would be covered with
GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false. Obviously trivial, but I wonder if
the rest of the coverage would look different when passed through the various GIT_TEST_* options.
That would make it take at least 12x as long if you did them one at a
time. Probably just 2-3x as long in practice since most can be combined
in some way, and somewhat computationally infeasible if you're going to
try all possible combinations.
> [...]
> fsck.c
> fb8952077d 214) die_errno("Could not read '%s'", path);
>
> René Scharfe fb8952077: fsck: use strbuf_getline() to read
> skiplist file
The fault of a patch I submitted. Couldn't find a sane & portable way to
emulate cases where ferror() would trigger.
