Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> This one unfortunately seems to interact rather badly with your >> js/remote-archive-v2 topic which is already in 'next', when this >> topic is merged to 'pu', and my attempt to mechanically resolve >> conflicts breaks t5000. > > Hmm, should we drop js/remote-archive-v2 then? Any solution that > unblocks js/remote-archive-v2 will almost certainly depend on this > patch. That one is already in 'next' for quite some time. If you are retrating it, that's OK. Let me revert the topic out of 'next' and discard it, and then queue this one in 'pu'. Thanks.
