Re: [PATCHv3 00/23] Bring more repository handles into our code base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Please have a look at the last 4 patches specifically as they were new in
> the last iteration (but did not receive any comment), as they demonstrate
> and fix a problem that is only exposed when using GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1
> for the test suite.

Thanks. I only reviewed patches 18 and 20-23, as only those are
different from the previous iteration according to the range-diff.

I've written my comments about patch 18 already [1], and the other
patches look good to me.

In patch 21, I could go either way about whether it's more desirable to
pass the pool or the repository to the freeing functions.

Thanks for discovering the issue that patch 23 illustrates. I thought
that the tests were written carefully enough in that the_repository
didn't have any relevant objects or configurations (all relevant data
was in a path that is not the default repository), but apparently some
still slipped through.

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181115195416.21890-1-jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux