Re: [PATCH 0/1] rebase: understand -C again, refactor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Jeff King wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:38:24AM -0800, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> 
> > Phillip Wood reported a problem where the built-in rebase did not understand
> > options like -C1, i.e. it did not expect the option argument.
> > 
> > While investigating how to address this best, I stumbled upon 
> > OPT_PASSTHRU_ARGV (which I was so far happily unaware of).
> 
> I was unaware of it, too.

Thanks, that makes me feel better ;-)

> Looking at the OPT_PASSTHRU and its ARGV counterpart, I think the
> original intent was that you'd pass through normal last-one-wins
> individual options with OPT_PASSTHRU, and then list-like options with
> OPT_PASSTHRU_ARGV. But here you've used the latter to pass sets of
> individual last-one-wins options.
> 
> That said, I think what you've done here is way simpler and more
> readable than using a bunch of OPT_PASSTHRUs would have been. And even
> if it was not the original intent of the ARGV variant, I can't see any
> reason to avoid doing it this way.

Thank you, that makes me feel *even* better ;-)

Together with the extra-early error checking for incorrect -C and
--whitespace options, I think we're in a much better place now.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux