SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> + if (tmp_allowed_versions[0] != config_version) >> + for (int i = 1; i < nr_allowed_versions; i++) > > We don't do C99 yet, thus the declaration of a loop variable like this > is not allowed and triggers compiler errors. I thought we did a weather-balloon to see if this bothers people who build on minority platforms but git grep 'for (int' is coming up empty. We have been trying designated initializers with weather-balloon changes (both arrays and struct fields) and I somehow thought that we already were trying this out, but apparently that is not the case. Also trailing comma in the enum definition was what we discussed earlier but I do not know if we had weather-balloon for it or not offhand. Perhaps we should write these down in CodingGuidelines.
