Re: [PATCH 2/3] ieot: default to not writing IEOT section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Ben Peart wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 7:39 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> As with EOIE, popular versions of Git do not support the new IEOT
>> extension yet.  When accessing a Git repository written by a more
>> modern version of Git, they correctly ignore the unrecognized section,
>> but in the process they loudly warn
>>
>> 	ignoring IEOT extension
>>
>> resulting in confusion for users.  Introduce the index extension more
>> gently by not writing it yet in this first version with support for
>> it.
[...]
>> Introduce a '[index] recordOffsetTable' configuration variable to
>> control whether the new index extension is written.
>
> Why introduce a new setting to disable writing the IEOT extension instead of
> just using the existing index.threads setting?  If index.threads=1 then the
> IEOT extension isn't written which (I believe) will accomplish the same
> goal.

Do you mean defaulting to index.threads=1?  I don't think that would
be a good default, but if you have a different change in mind then I'd
be happy to hear it.

Or do you mean that if the user has explicitly specified index.threads=true,
then that should imply index.recordOffsetTable=true so users only have
to set one setting to turn it on?  I can imagine that working well.

Thanks,
Jonathan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux