Re: [PATCH 2/3] ieot: default to not writing IEOT section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:12 AM Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > How about
> >
> >       hint: ignoring an optional IEOT extension
> >
> > to make it clear that it is totally harmless?
> >
> > With that, we can add advise.unknownIndexExtension=false to turn all
> > of them off with a single switch.
>
> I like it.  Expect a patch soon (tonight or tomorrow) that does that.
>
> We'll have to find some appropriate place in the documentation to
> explain what the message is about, still.

Also from the last discussion, if I remember correctly, this
"ignoring" is considered harmless and could be suppressed most of the
time. But commands like 'fsck' should always report it.
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux