Re: [PATCH 0/2] avoid unsigned long for timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Carlo,

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:

> specially problematic in Windows where unsigned long is only 32bit wide
> and therefore the assumption that a time_t would fit will lead to loss
> of precision in a 64bit OS.

Both patches look correct to me.

Thanks!
Dscho

> 
>  builtin/commit.c | 4 ++--
>  read-cache.c     | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> 

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux