Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] range-diff fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] range-diff fixes
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:32:32 +0100 (STD)
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@xxxxxxx>, Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20181109101803.3038-1-avarab@gmail.com>
References: <20181107122202.1813-3-avarab@gmail.com> <20181109101803.3038-1-avarab@gmail.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23)

Hi Ævar,

On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> Addresses feedback on v3, especially Eric's suggestion to split out
> the behavior change (which I was not aware of) into a 3/3.

For the record, I am fine with this iteration, too.

Ciao,
Dscho

References:
- [PATCH v3 2/2] range-diff: fix regression in passing along diff options
  - From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
- [PATCH v4 0/3] range-diff fixes
  - From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rebase: consolidate clean-up code before leaving reset_head()
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 0/3] range-diff fixes
Next by thread: [PATCH v4 1/3] range-diff doc: add a section about output stability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux