Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@xxxxxxx> writes: >> +This is particularly true when passing in diff options. Currently some >> +options like `--stat` can as an emergent effect produce output that's > > "`--stat` can as an emergent": I read that for times to decided it was correct > grammar. Should it be reworded to read better? Just a nit. A pair of comma around "as an ... effect" would make it a bit more readable. It also took me four reads before I convinced myself that the original wants to say "Some options may just do whatever they happen to do that result in pretty useless output". > >> +quite useless in the context of `range-diff`. Future versions of >> +`range-diff` may learn to interpret such options in a manner specifc >> +to `range-diff` (e.g. for `--stat` summarizing how the diffstat >> +changed).
