Hi Ævar,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23 2018, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
> > Johannes Schindelin (2):
> > rebase --autostash: demonstrate a problem with dirty submodules
> > rebase --autostash: fix issue with dirty submodules
> >
> > builtin/rebase.c | 2 +-
> > t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 10 ++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> There's another bug with rebase.autoStash in master (and next/pu) but
> not v2.19.0. I tried to bisect bit it just comes down to 5541bd5b8f
> ("rebase: default to using the builtin rebase", 2018-08-08).
>
> Credit to a co-worker of mine who wishes to remain anonymous for
> discovering this. I narrowed down his test-case to (any repo will do):
>
> (
> rm -rf /tmp/todo &&
> git clone --single-branch --no-tags --branch=todo https://github.com/git/git.git /tmp/todo &&
> cd /tmp/todo &&
> rm Make &&
> git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD &&
> git -c rebase.autoStash=true -c pull.rebase=true pull &&
> if test $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) != 'todo'
> then
> echo 'On detached head!' &&
> git status &&
> exit 1
> else
> echo 'We are still on our todo branch!'
> fi
> )
I found the culprit. Patch forthcoming,
Dscho
