Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:05:02 +0100 (STD)
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>, shoelzer@xxxxxxxxx, gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8b22754b-89ec-ae04-c839-83810f93872f@kdbg.org>
References: <pull.64.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <69bc5924f94b56f92d9653b3a64f721bd03f1956.1541020294.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <c9e001de-3598-182d-416e-1e94f234c249@kdbg.org> <CACbrTHctZejfDTjqWqVfPYdb=ssD253Cd2isr3BxWsL1AqsH2w@mail.gmail.com> <e8b7b173-eaa1-0fad-7e6a-771389872886@kdbg.org> <CAPUEspgF0GjJPtMqmZjUmsEeaJpQQBBwOV9YOg8A6YBdwbdaFA@mail.gmail.com> <46aa1893-095b-9f0c-4989-e63ebaa88705@kdbg.org> <xmqqefc0mnlh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> <8b22754b-89ec-ae04-c839-83810f93872f@kdbg.org>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23)

Hi Hannes,

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Am 05.11.18 um 00:26 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > OK, thanks.  It seems that the relative silence after this message is
> > a sign that the resulting patch after squashing is what everybody is
> > happey with?
> 
> I'm not 100% happy. I'll resend a squashed patch, but it has to wait as
> I have to catch a train now.

Thank you for running with this.

Ciao,
Dscho

References:
- [PATCH 0/1] Make compat/poll safer on Windows
  - From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
- [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Steve Hoelzer via GitGitGadget
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Steve Hoelzer
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Carlo Arenas
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt

Prev by Date: Re: Design of multiple hash support
Next by Date: Re: Failed stash caused untracked changes to be lost
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
Next by thread: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2018, #01; Thu, 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]