On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:49 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:51:07PM +0100, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:39 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Continuing my exploration of what -Wunused-parameters can show us, here
> > > are some bug-fixes related to parse-options callbacks.
> > >
> > > This is the last of the actual bug-fixes I've found. After this, I have
> > > about 60 patches worth of cleanups (i.e., dropping the unused
> > > parameters), and then I have a series to annotate parameters that must
> > > be unused (e.g., for functions that must conform to callback
> > > interfaces). After we can start compiling with -Wunused-parameters,
> > > assuming we don't find the annotations too cumbersome.
> >
> > Another good thing from this series is there are fewer --no-options to complete.
> >
> > About the annotating unused parameters related to segfault bug fixes
> > in this series. Should we just add something like
> >
> > if (unset)
> > BUG("This code does not support --no-stuff");
> >
> > which could be done in the same patches that fix the segfault, and it
> > extends the diff context a bit to see what these callbacks do without
> > opening up the editor, and also serves as a kind of annotation?
>
> That's done in the final patch. I did originally do it alongside the
> actual segfault fixes, but since it needs doing in so many other
> callbacks, too, it made sense to me to do it all together.
Oops. I guess I stopped reading the series too early. Sorry for the noise.
--
Duy
