Re: [PATCH v4] gpg-interface.c: detect and reject multiple signatures on commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:32 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Perhaps my gpg is too old?
> >
> > $ gpg --version
> > gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.15
> > libgcrypt 1.7.3
> > Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> >
> > Home: /home/pclouds/.gnupg
> > Supported algorithms:
> > Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA, ECDH, ECDSA, EDDSA
> > Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH,
> >         CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256
> > Hash: SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
> > Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
>
> Perhaps this is indeed specific to this version of GnuPG.  The tests
> pass for me with both 1.4.21 and 2.2.10.  We don't have 2.1* in Gentoo
> anymore.

Yeah I have not really used gpg and neglected updating it. Will try it
now. The question remains though whether we need to support 2.1* (I
don't know at all about gnupg status, maybe 2.1* is indeed too
old/buggy that nobody should use it and so we don't need to support
it).
-- 
Duy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux