Re: [PATCH 19/24] submodule: use submodule repos for object lookup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/2/2018 1:23 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:03 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/30/2018 6:08 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
This converts the 'show_submodule_header' function to use
the repository API properly, such that the submodule objects
are not added to the main object store.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
A couple tests are broken in 'pu' when run with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1,
including t4041-diff-submodule-option.sh. The failure bisects to this patch.

Here is a verbose output of the first failure in that script:;


expecting success:
          git diff-index -p --submodule=log HEAD >actual &&
          cat >expected <<-EOF &&
          Submodule sm1 $head2..$head3 (rewind):
            < Add foo3 ($added foo3)
            < Add foo2 ($added foo2)
          EOF
          test_cmp expected actual

+ git diff-index -p --submodule=log HEAD
+ cat
+ test_cmp expected actual
+ diff -u expected actual
--- expected    2018-11-02 12:58:43.429262380 +0000
+++ actual      2018-11-02 12:58:43.429262380 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-Submodule sm1 30b9670..dafb207 (rewind):
+Submodule sm1 30b9670...dafb207:
     < Add foo3 (hinzugefügt foo3)
     < Add foo2 (hinzugefügt foo2)
+  > Add foo1 (hinzugefügt foo1)
+  < Add foo1 (hinzugefügt foo1)
error: last command exited with $?=1
not ok 9 - modified submodule(backward)

I've been looking into the patch below to see if there is an obvious
problem, but the best I can think is that open_submodule() creates an
alternate 'struct repository' and somehow the commit-graph feature is
interacting poorly with that struct.

Stefan, do you know what's going on?
Sure, see the last four patches of this series
https://public-inbox.org/git/20181030220817.61691-1-sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx/
(to which you also reply to? Junio did not queue this one, yet).

Sorry! Got a bit mixed up looking at everything. I didn't realize that the current 'pu' didn't have your latest. Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux