Re: [PATCH 0/9] saner xdiff hunk callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... it seems rather silly that we have xdiff generate a string
> just so that we can parse it from within the same process. So instead I
> improved the xdiff interface to pass the actual integers out, made use
> of it as appropriate, and then in the final patch we can just drop the
> buggy function entirely.

Acked-by: me.

Thanks.  This is exactly what I wanted to do for a very long time,
ever since I did the original xdiff-interface.c



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux