On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Martin Ågren wrote: > > Rewrite the loop to a more idiomatic variant which doesn't muck with > > `len` in the loop body. That should help compilers and human readers > > figure out what is going on here. But do note that we need to update > > `len` since it is not only used just after this loop (where we could > > have used `i` directly), but also later in this function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > ACK. Thanks for cleaning up after me, Looks good to me, as well. Thanks for working on it.
