On 31/10/2018 02:50, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks to Junio for the feedback on v2. I've updated patch 4 based on >> those comments, the rest are unchanged. > > Hmph, all these five patches seem to be identical to what I have in > 'pu'. Did you send the right version? Oh dear that's embarrassing. I updated the patches on my laptop and forget to sync before sending them from my desktop. I'll send v4 now. Sorry for the confusion Phillip > >> v1 cover letter: >> >> This is a follow up to pw/rebase-i-author-script-fix, it reduces code >> duplication and improves rebase's parsing of the author script. After >> this I'll do another series to share the code to write the author >> script. >> >> Phillip Wood (5): >> am: don't die in read_author_script() >> am: improve author-script error reporting >> am: rename read_author_script() >> add read_author_script() to libgit >> sequencer: use read_author_script() >> >> builtin/am.c | 60 ++-------------- >> sequencer.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> sequencer.h | 3 + >> 3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
